Have you been called by the CDC (Center of Disease Control) lately to survey numbers on a terrible epidemic?  I have been – four times!

Was it about Chronic Lyme disease?

No, it was about H1N1 – a viral infection – supposedly out of control – driving vaccine company profits through the roof (oh, and lets not forget the side effects of the vaccine see…..) randomly killing the young and old.  Well, tell me, how could they be calling with massive surveys and yet at the same time the CDC has curiously stopped counting cases?

Rumors trickled to Sharyl Attkisson, a CBS News correspondent and investigative reporter – and she couldn’t turn away from the curious discrepancy between facts and hyperbole and exaggerated mis-information.  This is not a small town journalist.

Ms. Atkkinson has covered Capitol Hill since February 2006, has been a Washington-based correspondent there since January 1995 and was also part of the CBS news team that received the Edward Murrow Award in 2005 for overall excellence.

Additionally, Ms. Attkisson received an Outstanding Investigative Journalism Emmy in 2002 for a series on the Red Cross.  So this is not a conspiracy theory loose canon but an honorable journalist (the kind we like!)

In case you haven’t heard about this, you may be shocked that it is not being highlighted as a top story on all major media outlets.  Sharyl Attkisson is the investigative reporter behind the groundbreaking CBS News study that found H1N1 flu cases are NOT as prevalent as feared.

In fact, they’re barely on the radar screen.

How did this startling information come about, and why is the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) painting a different picture entirely?  Thanks to Dr. Mercola’s blog we have the information she gathered directly from the source.

Ms. Attkisson says:

“The reason I looked into this is a couple of months ago, I got tips from three or four different segments of public healthcare, with folks telling me the CDC has recommended that they go ahead and stop testing for and counting swine flu cases.

Each different entity that contacted me was concerned, thinking that this should not be happening. They really felt that it was necessary for the swine flu to continue to be tracked in some details. So I went about trying to find out why this decision was made and what the ramifications would be.

… I started by contacting the CDC and the HHS and asking some basic questions. I felt like I pretty much got stonewalled with some of the information I really needed to get at, especially what I needed from the states data, and information on the rationale behind this decision to stop counting and testing for swine flu.”

Because the CDC did not initially respond to Attkisson’s requests, she contacted all 50 states directly, asking for their statistics on state lab-confirmed H1N1 prior to the halt of individual testing and counting in July. She also asked states, one by one, to help explain the rationale behind the CDC’s decision to stop tracking H1N1 cases.

Attkisson continues:

“One of my good sources within the government said to me that they’re either trying to, in his opinion, over-represent the swine flu numbers or under-represent by not counting them anymore. He said, “You need to find out which it is.” And so to find out which it might be, I really wanted to see the data that the CDC had at the time it made the decision to quit counting the cases.”

If you listen to most media outlets and even to government agencies, you get the impression that virtually every person who has visited their physician with flu-like symptoms in recent months has H1N1, with no testing necessary because, after all, there’s an epidemic.

We are all being led to believe that every case diagnosed as “swine flu” or even as “flu-like illness” is, in fact, swine flu.

But Attkisson’s investigation revealed a very different picture right from her first contact with individual states. She explains:

“Across the country, state by state, they were testing [for H1N1] until CDC told them not to bother. They were testing, in general, the cases most likely to be believed to have been swine flu based on a doctor’s diagnosis of symptoms and risk factors such as travel to Mexico.

These special cases were going to state labs for absolute confirmation with the best test — not the so-called “rapid testing,” but the real confirmation test.

Of those presumed likely swine flu cases out of approximately every hundred of what was tested, only a small fraction were actually swine flu. In every instance, perhaps the biggest number of cases that were swine flu was something like 30%.  The smallest number was something like 2% or 3%.

Maybe there’s one state where it was just 1%.

The point is, of the vast majority of the presumed swine flu cases recognized by trained physicians, the vast majority were not flu at all. They weren’t swine flu or regular flu; they were some other sort of upper respiratory infection.”

And with the knowledge we share about a TRUE fatal epidemic called Lyme Disease, it is a blow to our faith in American health programs (that we pay for).  Not surprisingly the CDC just doesn’t want the American public to know …

“The CDC explained that one of the reasons they quit counting was because of all the flu that’s out there, most are swine flu. Well, that’s true. Most of the flu that was out there was indeed swine flu, but they failed to say that most of the suspected flu was nothing at all. And I think that’s the caveat the public just didn’t know,” Attkisson explains.

She gives even more striking examples of the numbers the investigative report revealed. For instance:

• In Florida, 83 percent of specimens that were presumed to be swine flu were negative for all flu when tested!
• In California, 86 percent of suspected H1N1 specimens were not swine flu or any flu; only 2 percent were confirmed swine flu.
• In Alaska, 93 percent of suspected swine flu specimens were negative for all flu types; only 1 percent was H1N1 flu.

It is not easy for journalists to access this type of information, and they often have to wait weeks, months or even years for information from the CDC and the FDA — information that is readily available and supposed to be clearly public.

Attkisson expands on the difficulties she faced in trying to get simple data regarding swine flu cases in the United States:

“They [CDC’s public affairs] quit communicating with me when I pressed on why I couldn’t get certain information. They just wouldn’t answer my emails anymore. So I had to file a Freedom of Information request, which is usually my last choice because I know I was going into a deep black hole many times and I’ll never get an answer.

But in this case, I got an interesting response on October 19 from the CDC when I had asked for some simple, public documents that would have been easy for them to obtain too quickly.

Journalists are allowed to ask for expedited processing of their Freedom of Information request because, for obvious reasons, they’re working on a story that may have public impact or be of public interest. The agencies are not supposed to use the Freedom of Information Law to obstruct or delay the release of this information.

This may be the first time I was denied that expedited processing from Freedom of Information that we’re entitled to as members of the press; a letter from HHS or Health and Human Services (the CDC is under HHS) said to me that one of the reasons they’re denying my expedited processing is because this is not a matter of “widespread and exceptional media or public interest.”

In other words, the CDC doesn’t think these questions about swine flu prevalence and these other things that we’ve been asking are, at least in their opinion in this letter, not a matter of widespread and exceptional media or public interest.”

Yet, while the CDC expressed that questions about swine flu prevalence were not a matter of widespread media or public interest, the President had declared the swine flu a national public health emergency!

The inconsistencies at the CDC are nearly incomprehensible.

According to Attkisson’s CBS News study, when you come down with chills, fever, cough, runny nose, malaise and all those other “flu-like” symptoms, the illness is likely caused by influenza at most 17 percent of the time and as little as 3 percent! The other 83 to 97 percent of the time it’s caused by other viruses or bacteria.

So remember that not every illness that appears to be the flu actually is the flu. In fact, most of the time it’s not.

Curiously, the CDC still advises those who were told they had 2009 H1N1 (and therefore should be immune to getting it again) to get vaccinated unless they had lab confirmation.

But because very few people have actually had a lab-confirmed case of H1N1 (and in most cases those people told they had swine flu probably did not), this means nearly everyone is still being advised to get the swine flu vaccine.

Attkisson has been one of the few to speak out against this flawed system and point out the serious ramifications that come when a public health agency is secretive about their health data.

Attkisson says:

“From a public and journalistic standpoint, I believe the mistake comes when you don’t fully disclose to the public as you go and discover the mistakes. Try to disclose and fix things that come up.

Everybody understands that there isn’t a perfect system, but I think you need to be upfront with them, explain what you’re doing, and explain what you’re discovering. If you’ve made a mistake or you feel like you need to correct something, say that, too, but don’t just try to keep information from the public.”

If you’d like to learn more about the report and its findings, you can read all the details in the past article CBS Reveals that Swine Flu Cases Seriously Overestimated.

The following comes directly from CBS on their website at http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/10/21/cbsnews_investigates/main5404829.shtml.

“In late July, the CDC abruptly advised states to stop testing for H1N1 flu, and stopped counting individual cases. The rationale given for the CDC guidance to forego testing and tracking individual cases was: why waste resources testing for H1N1 flu when the government has already confirmed there’s an epidemic?

Some public health officials privately disagreed with the decision to stop testing and counting, telling CBS News that continued tracking of this new and possibly changing virus was important because H1N1 has a different epidemiology, affects younger people more than seasonal flu and has been shown to have a higher case fatality rate than other flu virus strains.

CBS News learned that the decision to stop counting H1N1 flu cases was made so hastily that states weren’t given the opportunity to provide input. Instead, on July 24, the Council for State and Territorial Epidemiologists, CSTE, issued the following notice to state public health officials on behalf of the CDC:

“Attached are the Q&As that will be posted on the CDC website tomorrow explaining why CDC is no longer reporting case counts for novel H1N1. CDC would have liked to have run these by you for input but unfortunately there was not enough time before these needed to be posted (emphasis added).”

When CDC did not provide us with the material, we filed a Freedom of Information request with the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). More than two months later, the request has not been fulfilled. We also asked CDC for state-by-state test results prior to halting of testing and tracking, but CDC was again, initially, unresponsive.

While we waited for CDC to provide the data, which it eventually did, we asked all 50 states for their statistics on state lab-confirmed H1N1 prior to the halt of individual testing and counting in July. The results reveal a pattern that surprised a number of health care professionals we consulted.

The vast majority of cases were negative for H1N1 as well as seasonal flu, despite the fact that many states were specifically testing patients deemed to be most likely to have H1N1 flu, based on symptoms and risk factors, such as travel to Mexico.“

For those of us suffering and dying from acute, chronic and/or neurological Lyme disease, this information is like a slap in the face.

But we can’t give up.

For those of us strong enough to write, we need to flood our US legislators with pleas for help – descriptive letters listing the myriad of symptoms we have, and how severely we suffer.

We must join together and push hard or we will never get the help we need.  Wouldn’t it be nice to have the CDC call you to determine the actual cases of Lyme disease?

I haven’t posted anything for a long time due to research and writing the ebooks on alternative treatments for chronic and neuro Lyme, and I have been amassing a lot of material for this blog.

Look at the tiny tick on the finger and tell me if you check yourself daily for ticks that small…do you?  I think it is next to impossible to verify daily that one of those tiny ticks isn’t infecting you or a loved one through the scalp hidden by hair…it is hard to venture outdoors in endemic Maine.  Living in the northeast takes courage for those of us with chronic Lyme but our nation needs to understand that it is not just the northeast at risk.

Infected “yet” – yes, the eternal optimist (me) is coming to an unavoidable conclusion that with the spread of Lyme snowballing in numbers it is only a matter of time before every man, woman and child has some form of Lyme in their body, from the Florida keys to the islands of Hawaii, the truth of how easily this bacteria spreads from one host to another is only now beginning to come to light.

The intelligence of this virulent morphing monster has scientists reeling with one puzzle after another to try and corner and eliminate the dreaded disease(s).

However, I choose to continue to believe that inspired scientists with their level heads (and lack of time for politicking) will develop a vaccine and cure in due time, we just need to pray together that this will happen sooner rather than later!

I am sorry to harp on a topic that is so farmiliar to those of us who live with these facts, but please take the time today to share this picture with everyone you know.

A picture is worth a thousand words.  Don’t you agree?

Blessings,

Jenna